MAD Perspectives Blog

Transparency & Authenticity

Peggy Dau - Monday, July 27, 2009

 

Tranparent.  Authentic.  These may be the two most overused terms in social media. 

Every social media pundit emphasizes the importance of transparency and authenticity. 

 

Whether we are communicating as an individual or as an organization or company, we are encouraged to be transparent.  What does this mean?  The dictionary definition states “easily seen through, open, frank, candid”.  It means to be clear.  Clarity is often in the eyes of the beholder to adapt a well known phrase.  While the communicator may feel they are being clear, the listeners may not agree.  The evolution of social media is challenging organizations to be very clear in their intent and in their communication.  It also allows the listeners to emphatically state when communication is not clear. 

 

Hand in hand with transparency is authenticity.

The dictionary states “not false or copied, trustworthy, valid”.   It means to be honest.  There is an interesting paradox that states that perception is reality.  However, this does not mean perception is honest or authentic, yet the internet provides a forum for information exchange that is not always true.  Fortunately the increased level of interaction via various customer forums encourages reality checks.  A company can make claims to the value of its products.  However, if even one customer is unhappy there is a chance that they will express their dissatisfaction online, thus disruption the chain of communication promoted by the company.

 

 

Transparency and authenticity.

With the advance of social media, companies are being held to different standards.  Before the internet companies pushed information to their customers.  They created campaigns and messaging to position their products and services in the most positive light.  They were honest, to a point.  They did not have to worry about the viral nature of the internet where one unfavorable comment can mushroom into a perception that takes both time and money to reverse.  The messaging was, sometimes, overly positive.  It focused on the positive and on the benefit to consumers or businesses. 

 

 

Companies are learning to listen.

As they become more transparent (i.e., Dell asking for advice on how to improve its customer service) and authentic (i.e., Zappos) they are understanding that they have an opportunity to create much tighter customer relationships.  They have the ability to understand the needs and demands of their customers better than ever before.  However, they must open themselves up to this interaction by becoming more transparent and more authentic.

So, yes these terms are overused, but they are the keys to success in implementing a social media strategy, internally or externally!

What's your perspective?

 

 




RSS


Recent Posts


Tags

business intelligence rich media corporate identity webcasts broadcast, IBC, digital media, analytics networking influence Intel openness MassRelevance Miso HP planning, analysis storytelling cross channel honesty printing consulting inspriation Skype Yammer Compuware benefits search Nigel Fenwick communication medium Twitter Cotendo SocialText OTT empower Facebook personality video conferencing social media, firewall, social computing, employees, connect business goals customer social identity control data lead generation video New Technologies Taylor O'Brien LinkedIn MIB MediaWorks streaming media strategy user generated content convesation, interaction, social media, rich media, video, Ford Fiesta language blog executive support authenticity, transparency, conversation, truth, honesty social computing Web Strategy broadcast Vizrt governance marketing slideshare truth passion Pinterest Apple news gathering BuddyTV market awareness marshall mcluhan online video platform transparency brand strategy tweetdeck Altimeter ROI employees ePrint Center Utterli microblogging adapt social media marketing social media index NewsGator content delivery network content marketing social telepresence Enterprise 2.0 digital asset management conversation GetGlue cloud computing hootsuite Never.no trackur SocialCast EGC Mark Brodie dog MAD perspectives brand collaborate B2B UGC Citrix, trust B2B marketing connect, collaborate, communicate, digital media, consulting, social media communicate authenticity Kontiki case study community apps Social TV lessons Ford Whisky planning YouTube employee generated content Boston connected TV leadership BT Conferencing digital media identity organizations webinar New York Times company culture video marketing NAB culture alignment content Harris Mad Bear Produionsct value message privacy human CDN Fiesta sales Present.ly web 2.0 holidays social media plan Gizmodo snow social media SEC firewall enterprise stimulate DAM voice of customer Jeremiah Owyang policy relationships interaction disclaimers tablet Chyron North Plains technology IBC innovate Peggy Dau MarketingProfs Forrester connect Mad Bear Productions cloud social networking


Archive