MAD Perspectives Blog

OTT is Not THE Panacea

Peggy Dau - Wednesday, November 12, 2014

We're all excited that HBO's direct-to-consumer streaming service will be available in 2015. We don't even know what it's going to cost. But we do know that it's market shifting. These thoughts were on everyone's mind at the Video Industry Forum, hosted by Ooyala and Vindicia, discussion regarding video monetization. While the very informed panelists, including Jim O'Neill, believe in the opportunity enabled by OTT service providers, none of the panelists could provide explicit insight into the best way to monetize video.  And, that's OK.

Like everything internet oriented, the key is to keep an open mind and understand that multiple iterations of business models must be tried, tested and tweaked.  Sure, HBO is going to benefit from streaming content directly to their consumers. As mentioned my previous blog, they will benefit from the volumes of data and gain further insight into the behavior and opinions of their audience. HBO also benefits from already having a rich content library. They've put the time and money into developing and producing compelling drama, comedy and sports productions.

They will drive incremental revenue through their streaming service. But their inability to define the monetization model is not unusual. Theirs will likely be a subscription model and the open question is the cost of that subscription. In the OTT arena the options are 1) subscription, 2) advertising, 3) Pay-per-view, 4) Subscription VOD (SVOD), and 5) electronic sell through (EST). The primary challenge is in how to attract and retain the ever so elusive millennials. 

Millennials are the demographic consuming content on laptops, tablets and smartphones. They are the target for multiple advertisers. Yet, they don't all have sufficient income to commit to a subscription model and t is unclear if they are attracted to ad-supported models. In fact, they are the generation with an expectation of free music (hello Spotify) and that expectation may extend to video content.

The OTT business model is the challenge. Verizon is investigating options. Jim O'Neill highlighted the challenge of "lassoing" millennials at Ooyala's Video Industry Forum last week, in New York. In fact the panelists at the forum all agreed that:

     - monetization is hard and it's a moving target
  •      - OTT is still the wild west and no one is sure what the end goal is
  •      - OTT is long over due as there are audiences everywhere
  •      - Despite the abundance of data, few are using that data to target ads, despite this being a      prominent discussion for years.

The second challenge, which could completely obliterate the first, is that of authentication. Right now all network designed tablet apps require a cumbersome authentication process binding OTT access to an existing cable subscription. If the content is compelling enough, the process is manageable, however it is not intuitive or easy. Nor do the apps retain your authentication details for more than two weeks.

The bottom line is that OTT must drive a revenue stream. The challenge is that no one model is THE solution.  Like the adoption of social media, it's an iterative process to determine the right mix. The right business model could depend on the content, or the target audience, or the consumption device, or the content format. Despite this challenge, OTT is here to stay. Sure, we will still consume content  on our HD and UHD TVs, but we will increasingly turn to the smaller screen.

What's your perspective?

Who Wins in the Streaming Game?

Peggy Dau - Thursday, November 06, 2014

With all the discussion and analysis of HBO's streaming announcement, it could be construed that HBO and the consumer are the big winners. But what about the technologies that enable the streaming service? Yes, these technologies are often taken for granted, until there is a mishap. It could be re-buffering of content, or the inability to recognize a user ID, or in-accessibility of content on certain platforms. Behind the scenes there is an army of technology providers addressing concerns for content delivery, content discovery, digital rights, transcoding, subscriber management, billing, ad insertion, graphical user interface and more.

Perhaps the most important component enabling consumer enjoyment of streaming content is the content delivery network. Many consumers assume that their local broadband/internet provider is responsible for enabling the delivery of Netflix type content. This is partly true. Yes, Verizon, Comcast, Charter and others are responsible for the last mile deliver of content into your home. But, that content has traveled many miles from its original source. Content Delivery Networks use a distributed network of servers and software to analyze web traffic and optimize delivery of content across the internet while protecting the content from malicious attacksIt is thanks to technologies from companies like Akamai, Level 3, or Edgecast,  that we are able to enjoy major league baseball games, the Olympics, Netflix or any broadcast or cable network content on our laptops, tablets or mobile devices.

A colleague recently mentioned that Akamai must be printing money with the rise in streaming content. They, and their competitors, are certainly appreciating the rise of OTT services delivering sports, news and entertainment content into consumer homes. Akamai's recent Q3 financial results certainly confirm the demand for their services, with revenue up 26% year over year and overall exceptional financial performance.  In fact, media delivery solutions, were specifically called out in Akamai's Q3 earnings call.

Content Delivery Networks are one of the original cloud solutions as they've been positioning hardware and software assets in remote locations to enable user access to content via the internet. They've been a part of our internet experience since the late 1990's. Long before the term "cloud" entered our every day technology vernacular, CDNs were leasing space in Internet Data Centers to house farms of servers, persistently tweaking algorithms and enhancing content protection solutions. 

While other technologies may not be exceeding market expectations at the same level as Akamai, announcements like HBO's, certainly excite the technology ecosystem enabling streaming content. It also puts incremental pressure on solution providers to simplify content discovery (regardless of platform or distribution channel), enhance digital rights management and streamline user authentication. It's safe to say that winners abound in the ongoing push to stream entertainment, sports and news programs. Just don't assume its only the content owners or consumers!

What's your perspective?

HBO Playing Catch UP

Peggy Dau - Monday, October 27, 2014

October is being hailed as a milestone month for TV due to the announcements from HBO and CBS regarding their direct-to-consume streaming services. It is generally agreed that the motivation was money (isn't' it always?) and a desire to align with the needs of their respective audiences. However, not much has been written about the need to stay relevant; or, the benefit of actually having a direct connection with their audience.

The evolution of televised content is storied. In fact, it's time for someone to tell the story of Cable and Pay TV (a la Ted Turner and John Malone), in the style of Mad Men regaling the exploits of ad men during advertising's golden age or AMC's lesser known, but equally compelling series, Halt & Catch Fire which dramatizes the birth of the personal computer revolution. The use of satellites to deliver content to cable head-ends forever changed our TV viewing experience. Thanks to HBO and Ted Turner, we were able to access premium movie content and 24 hour news in our homes. 

Even with HBO's creation of original content in its early days, it was primarily known for delivering marquee sports events (e.g., 1975's "Thrilla in Manila between Muhammad Ali" and Joe Frazier) and Hollywood movies. It's notable original content emerged during the 1990s with The Larry Sanders Show, then followed by Curb Your Enthusiasm, Sex and the City and so on to today's Boardwalk Empire and Game of Thrones. Broadcast networks were forced to take note when HBO garnered award nominations and ultimately began winning the lion's share of the annual awards for quality content.

HBO set the stage for quality drama and comedic series. They established a high standard for cable networks, many of which simply syndicated broadcast television content. Struggling USA Networks succeeded in a turnaround resulting from producing character-centric original programming such as Monk, Burn Notice and White collar. Other networks have subsequently followed suit, syndicating content for daytime hours while offering original programming during primetime.

However, it was Netflix who set the stage for the current upheaval. HBO will always be known for a Pay-TV business model enhanced by producing original content to attract subscribers. But, Netflix initiated the use of subscriber data to capitalize upon audience search and consumption patterns to produce content to fulfill their desires. This is the benefit of a streaming service. The direct connection to consumers that Netflix and Amazon has not only allowed fans to consumer content based on their schedule, they have also enabled the concept of binge viewing. No longer must an audience wait for the weekly broadcast of Homeland or The Good Wife. They can enjoy an entire season over a weekend, if they choose.

HBO and CBS will certainly appreciate bumps in their revenue streams, but they will also gain much greater insight into audience behavior. Their ability to capture and analyze fan reaction and resulting behavior will enhance their ability create content that viewers want to watch. Certainly, they have already been monitoring social networks to gain insight into the real-time emotions of their audience. Of course they seek superior original content that aligns with market trends for all things fantasy, sci-fi or vampire oriented (although don't we have enough blood suckers on-air already?). But, that is not enough.

Much of Netflix's success comes from their well-documented obsession with data. This is where HBO must play catch up, solely because they have been missing one important dimension of data - the insight that comes from having a direct streaming relationship with subscribers. Understanding how subscribers discover the content they wish to view and correlating that data based on previous content consumed, genre, actors, time of day, month or other demographics, deliver incremental value to content producers. Content strategies, scheduling, pricing, talent - they may all be impacted by the data collected. And, in return they may instigate further data. HBO is certainly not suffering from a lack of quality programming. To maintain relevance in a world where consumption patterns are changing dramatically, HBO must play catch up in offering a streaming option, if only to capture the relevant data.

What's your perspective?


Snip Snip - Hooray!?

Peggy Dau - Monday, October 20, 2014

At last. Premium content without having to have a cable or Pay TV subscription. Bowing to consumer demand, HBO and Showtime will offer access to their programming which includes the wildly popular, Game of Thrones, and critically acclaimed, Homeland. For those who have never subscribed to premium cable channels, this an opportunity to play catch up. But, more importantly this is the seismic shift that has been forecast since the rise of OTT services (streaming content over your broadband connection).

The benefit to HBO and Showtime is access to incremental revenue. Millions of households don't subscribe to their services which are priced as a premium over and above the selected Pay TV subscription bundle. There have been options for individuals to access this content via tablet based-apps, HBOGo and Showtime Anytime, using household or family member passwords. And, others have waited for series to be available on OTT services such as Netflix. Studies have shown the popularity of the content whether accessed on a tablet/laptop or using internet connected devices like XBox. We can expect an avalanche of other streaming offers to come from the rest of the cable channels. The difference now, is that fans don't have to wait top play seasonal catchup, nor do they need to "borrow" passwords. They can subscribe directly to HBO or Showtime, without an intermediary.

The announcement is timely given the recent reports from ComScore and Ooyala reinforcing where and how we consume content. The all important millennials (ages 18-34) consume ⅓ of their original series content on digital platforms. Why? Flexibility of place and time. The millennials are also much less likely to subscribe to cable or other pay TV services. An argument could be made that millennials don't have the income levels (particularly at the lower end of the age range) to support pay TV subscriptions. And, that others ARE subscribing and that they represent the majority. So why are millennials the driving force behind new business models? They represent the future and the habits they have and are forming today will stay with them. Like the publishing and music industries, the television industry is in the midst of a dramatic shift.

The shift is not due to a lack of interest in televised content. It's about the audience taking control of the schedule, and as a result the business model for accessing desired content. Approximately 40% of US households already have a paid digital video subscription via a service such as Netflix or Amazon. The success of these services has been debated even as subscriptions have risen thanks to the availability of original content or not grown as quickly as anticipated in new markets. Whichever side of the debate you may sit on, the adoption of streamed content is here to stay. Subscription plans and budgets will determine the uptake rate. 

Consumers are hopeful for options that allow them to maintain or reduce their existing TV-related costs, while gaining access to previously unavailable programs. As mentioned in my recent blog, Alternatives to Content Socialism subscribers have grown tired of cable bundles that include channels with content of little or no interest. The home audience isn't ready to give up its cable subscription. It simply wants options and flexibility. Even with broadcast TV viewership declining, the core U.S. networks, ABC, CBS, NBC and FOX, deliver must-see TV in the form of sports. These networks already provide live streaming alternatives, but it's the big screen experience that continues to bring fans together at the appointed game time.

No pricing for the streaming services has been shared, yet, by HBO or CBS/Showtime. When it is revealed, it will become clear as to how well these content creators understand their audience. There is a tipping point when it comes to pricing. They've shown they understand the shift in how consumers want to enjoy content. Do they also understand the value placed on that content in terms of monthly subscription pricing? Only time will tell and what seems like cause for celebration, may result in dissatisfaction.

What's your perspective?

Sports Leading Innovation

Peggy Dau - Monday, October 13, 2014

it's no surprise that sporting events drive technology innovation - or is it? If you were to ask a friend about the technology of sports, they might shrug or look at you with a quizzical expression. However, given a few more minutes to think about it, they might actually come forth with a few ideas. In fact, sports has driven development and mainstreaming of a lot of broadcast technology that we now take for granted. As an example, look at how the way watch and enjoy sports has benefited from the innovations noted in this 2011 article from Business Insider.

The sports industry is all about creating a compelling fan experience. Sure, teams seek out amazing talent, build attractive stadiums and play to win. But it is the fans that pay to attend games, that pay to watch events on TV, that buy merchandise, that share their passion on social networks, that buy the devices that enable them to access information about their team - anytime, anywhere. As FIFA prepared for this year's world cup they understood that global football fans would be accessing match statistics and video from a myriad of devices. As a result, they invested in delivering multimedia services to their licensed broadcasters serving local fans.

These services focused on enabling online and second screen experiences. FIFA partners with Netco do develop an app that could be white-labeled by broadcasters. The app, used by 40 broadcasters, resulted in 28 million downloads. One billion users visited FIFA's Global Stadium - the social online media hub. It was only on digital platforms that fans could view matches from EVERY angle. On the social network front, the World Coup attracted 451M Facebook users and 16M Twitter followers.

The technology demands of the first global sporting event capturing and producing content in 4K required a host of broadcast technology from vendors including Sony, EVS, Deltatre, Netco, Elemental, Eutelsat, Globosat, Aspera, Akamai and Microsoft Azure. The mix of traditional broadcast vendors and vendors enabling online streaming and second screen experiences is a sign of the future. EVS, long known for its sports broadcasting technology, has proven its ability foresee audience demand through development of C-Cast to enable second screen publishing (used at the World Cup 2014) and its recently released FanCast, designed to enhance the in-stadium experience (and sure to be used at the next Olympics).

The IBC2014 Judges Award for broadcast innovation was awarded to the FIFA World Cup 2014 - a confirmation of sporting events driving the future of broadcast technology and ultimately, the fan experience. Sports fans are passionate. Sports fans will invest in the tools to feed their passion. Teams, leagues and non-sports oriented event organizers (e.g., entertainment, political) must take note and adopt the tools that makes sense for their budgets to optimize broadcast and second screen experiences. 

What's your perspective?

The Third Dimension - Context

Peggy Dau - Wednesday, October 08, 2014

The entertainment experience has been under invasion by social media and second screens for several years. Initially they were viewed with skepticism, then intrigue and ultimately accepted as the overall industry determined that they were more than a flash in the pan. They are more than a distraction and they are more than an incremental stream of revenue. They bring something extremely valuable to the audience experience. It is so valuable, in fact, that a lot of energy is being expended to ensure that they become even more tightly entwined with entertainment experiences, at home, or in stadium.

Yes, that's right at home or in stadium. Our entertainment experiences span many destinations. Not all of them are the optimal destination for accessing content via a second screen, so we'll focus on those locations that invite use of a screen to add context to the experience. Yes, context. This is the third dimension beyond time and content. Other than for live events, time has become a flexible concept (although, I suppose for physicists it has always been fluid). We access content as we like, wherever we are. In fact, we are willing to pay for that flexibility. However, the dimension that has been elusive has been context.

The rise of the second screen was initially touted as a distraction. It pulled the audience away from the action in front of them. However, comments on social media provided insight valuable to brands and advertisers. And, for sports fans, the second screen provided stats, comparisons and…yes, context. Context is defined as "the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood".  Whether we are enjoying scripted entertainment, reality programs, music or sports, thoughts are provoked which results in our accessing another screen to tap into the volumes of information available on the internet. We seek to validate or debate the moment which provoked the action.

Behind the scenes this craving for context is driving technology innovation. Whether it is platforms bringing together fans of the new season of "Scandal" or the legions of Champions League football fans. Whether we are in our homes or enjoying a match at the stadium, technology solutions are available, allowing us to access supplemental content which will provide context. Increasingly, technology vendors are investing in enhancing the stadium experience. It is no longer just about sitting in your seat. There are screens everywhere - from the very large to the very small. There is content provided by the sports club itself - some designed specifically for the big screen and other to provide context to the events on the field. 

The data - oh yes, there is a LOT of data, is aggregated, sliced and diced, to provide insight. It brings fans together as they compare performances. While the primary focus for augmenting the audience experience has been the use of second screens at home. The rise of second screen apps/platforms for use in stadiums is on the rise. It is more than ordering food to be delivered to your seat. They are apps developed by the stadium developers or sports club or league, designed to enhance the fan experience. The goal is to provide a more immersive experience - and it's all due to adding context.

We wrote about the rise of context earlier this year. It's about more than collecting the data, it's about using the data of add value. How often do you turn to your second screen for information to enhance an experience? Did you gain perspective about the event that prompted you to take that action? Did you add context to the situation? I bet you did.

What's your perspective?

Security and Protection Priorities Shifting

Peggy Dau - Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Protecting assets, data and information, from unwanted intrusion, is front page news these days. It seems that retailers, banks and other enterprises holding customer financial data are under persistent attack. Whereas the primary concern used to be about the security of data centers retaining corporate information about products, pricing, R&D and customers, today hackers are finding different entry points to access sensitive data.  Corporate concerns about data breaches are warranted, as there is a direct impact on revenue. The hack of consumer payment data at Target was followed by a revenue decline of 5.3%

The media & entertainment industry is no different. In fact, while subscriber data is critical to the success of these companies, media organizations face issues beyond subscriber data management and protection. They must secure and protect the content assets themselves while they are being created, when they are prepared for delivery and when they are being transported to business partners and/or consumers. Content piracy was the term used by vendors providing solutions in this space.  Content piracy results in revenue leakage for both content providers.

Just as retailers, banks and manufacturers protect data using sophisticated encryption solutions, media companies protect media assets with conditional access system (CAS) and digital rights management (DRM) solutions. The challenge for  Pay TV services, such as Comcast or BSkyB, is in only allowing subscribers who have paid for content to actually access that content. When the service owns the distribution network, CAS solutions have been deployed utilizing encryption keys tied to the subscriber's set-top box. For OTT delivery across IP networks, fixed or wireless, DRM solutions have been deployed. Regardless of distribution model, protecting content at all stages of the media lifecycle has been critical. 

The shift to IP content delivery combined with the increase in content consumption via tablets and smartphones introduces new challenges to an industry that has been dependent on solutions designed for managed networks and managed devices.  CAS vendors (e.g., Cisco, Nagra, Irdeto) have invested in enhancing encryption solutions focused on protecting content on behalf of Pay TV Operators, using the set-top box as the managed device. DRM solutions are used to protect content, on behalf of the content owner. DRM provides copy protection for content being accessed via un-managed devices, such as smartphones and tables. 

The two perspectives are starting to converge as Pay TV Operators are forced to deliver content to screens beyond the TV. While content providers have focused on content protection and delivering the content consumers want, they have paid limited attention to protecting subscriber data. They use the data to identify new revenue opportunities, but have not yet had to apply the same level of protection to subscriber data. Security as about managing access to content. Protection is about securing content during network transport. Both are about protecting revenue streams.

What's your perspective?

Alternatives to Content Socialism

Peggy Dau - Monday, September 22, 2014

Insightful conversations are the benefit of attending conferences. At IBC2014, in Amsterdam last week, I had a number of those experiences. It was interesting to see that nothing really BIG was announced. 4K content, which provides a much high quality image with a high dynamic range of color, continues to be a driver across all aspects of the media supply chain. File-based workflows, which have been under discussion for over 10 years, are still a dominant part of the conversation.

However, perhaps the most interesting conversation was the one, with Colin Dixon of nScreen Media, about content socialism. Yes, you are reading that correctly. To be more specific, this is about content socialism in the United States. What? How could there be any thing socialist in the US? Well, there is and has been for quite some time in the business model pursued by the cable operators. Where else do you pay for something that you don’t want but do so because others may want it?

Colin coined this term earlier this year in his blog about the NBA inflating its license fees with Pay TV networks. US Cable Operators have long benefited from a business model which bundles an assortment of channels together, many of which we as consumers never even watch. The discussion about transitioning to an a la carte model has been debated widely, with those on the business side arguing that the a la carte model would be even more expensive for consumers due to the licensing fees between content owners and cable operators. The assumption is that consumers are currently benefiting from economies of scale in the current licensing agreements.

With this thought in mind, I visited various stands and an alternative became evident. IP delivery channels have become an accepted, valuable avenue for monetization. It was my chat with John Maguire of S3 Group that solidified the following thoughts. When looking at the capabilities at every point along the media supply chain, the focus on IP delivery of content is prevalent. It is evident in solutions focused on capture and transmission of audio and video across fixed, mobile or WiFi networks.  IP networks connect file-based workflows. And, they are the growth channel into the consumer home. So, with all this IP capability, why not create content for IP consumption only?

Why create special interest channels for cable? They appeal to niche audiences who would be willing to pay for access to content. It would be less expensive to create content for OTT consumption only. OTT providers such as Netflix or Amazon Instant Video, could offer specialized content at an incremental fee, thus expanding their revenue base. No, this does not address the concern of content socialization. Yes, this needs to analyzed more fully and I’m sure a lot of smart people have already had these thoughts, but with the increase in online content consumption and the ability to more easily create content, perhaps this is an idea whose time is coming.  After all, it only took 10+ years for video-on-demand to become mainstream or for file-based workflows to be fully implemented by broadcasters.

What’s your perspective?

Connecting Live is Still Relevant!

Peggy Dau - Monday, September 08, 2014

I've been writing about connectivity for the past few weeks. I've done this because I believe connectivity is at the root of our human experience. Whether it is our family, friends, business colleagues, or even those who remain nameless, but share a common interest, we are always connected to someone or something. We exist in organizations, be they schools, businesses, clubs, sports teams, religious organizations. We attend and participate for education, exercise, creativity or community. No wonder the advances in communications technologies and services fascinate us.

But none of those technologies can replace the benefit of face to face gatherings. I've been living in the technology, communication and media sectors for the past decade or so. I love technology in how it simplifies and enhances my life. I am able to stay connected to my friends, family and clients from a variety of devices. I stay abreast of industry news via those same devices. However, i look forward to opportunities for valuable face time (and i'm not talking about the Apple video conferencing app).

This summer my family celebrated a few landmark events by enjoying a vacation together. While this may sound like a set up for a tragic comedy, it was a wonderful opportunity for all of us to relax together. While we talk, text, email and FaceTime (yes, this time I am talking about the Apple app) with each other on a regular basis, the opportunity to be together for a period of time was fantastic. It is the same for business. it is why the golf game evolved as such an acceptable and successful business event.

The conversation that occurs over a period of hours or days has depth that cannot be attained as quickly or easily via apps or devices. Sure with the help of social media and big data analytics, we can capture, sift and assess online conversations to uncover trends that impact business. However, it is the conversation with a business partner or client, on the golf course or over dinner, that reveals new opportunities, politics of closing a deal, or challenges to overcome.

I'm attending IBC 2014 this week, a conference service the broadcast industry. I enjoy the opportunity to discover emerging technologies and uncover new opportunities. I look forward to insightful conversations with business colleagues. I am thankful that so many colleagues have agreed to meet with me as our conversations help me gain greater perspective on the impact of big data, cloud, social media, mobility and other trends on an industry that has been in our homes for years. I am connecting live - how about you?

What's your perspective?

The Connected Experience

Peggy Dau - Tuesday, September 02, 2014

What is the impact of our increasing dependency on all things mobile? How is the the connectivity between things impacting our daily lives? Our desire for connectivity is evident in the increased investment in the "internet of things". Simply put, this is the ability for devices to communicate with each other.  This may take the form of alerts to your smartphone or using your smartphone to control other devices.  Much attention has been paid to connecting to devices in the home such as, thermostats, lights, locks, refrigerators or TVs. It is all driven by our addiction to connectivity, but what about the experience?

Examples of machine to machine (M2M) connectivity include being able to verbally unlock the doors of your house by speaking into you smartphone. Future functionality might include asking your TV to find the content you seek - by name, genre or talent. The advances in technology and networks enable this "futuristic" connectivity - similar to what we once enjoyed in the Hanna-Barbera animated sitcom,  "The Jetsons".  we seek experiences that enrich or simplify our daily lives.

We've already proven that we are addicted to devices as evidenced by estimates from eMarketer, that 1.75 billion people will own smarthphones by the end of 2014. That translates to ~ 24% of the global population (as of July 1, 2014 based on estimates from the United Nations). Smartphone adoption is led by China, followed by the United States, with these countries and many others passing the 50% penetration mark in 2014 and 2015.

We've shown that we like to enhance our experiences by using devices. We use the map functions on our phones to guide our explorations. We plan running routes and track calories. We comparison shop and make dinner reservations. Why not connect to other devices and simplify repetitive tasks? 

Devices that enabled an internet connection to our TV entered our homes in the mid-2000s. Today Smart or Connected TVs enable direct internet connections that in turn allow connectivity to OTT providers such as Netflix and Amazon Instant Video, music sharing site Pandora or social media maven, Facebook, and others. The benefit is the enjoy the connected experience via our favorite in-home device, the TV. We choose to  enhance our TV experience with our mobile devices, enriching our experience through simultaneous connectivity to online information related to the program we are viewing, or sharing our experience on social sites or simply multi-tasking.

The connected experience is one that is constantly evolving as our definition of connectivity and tasks that can be enabled expand. Our expectations are limitless as behemoths like Apple and Google invest in enabling technologies while also defining ecosystems that may include traditional manufacturers as well as entrepreneurs. It is safe to say that the manner in which we connect and communicate, one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-many, or thing-to-thing will be quite different five years from now. And, it is the focus on our connected experience that will drive this market evolution.

What's your perspective?


Recent Posts


Twitter news gathering DAM privacy context medium telepresence ABC MIB MediaWorks storytelling HDS Taylor O'Brien Vitrue FCC identity NBA CDN community Whisky lessons search culture awareness Attensity360 disclaimers SocialText MarketingProfs transparency Cotendo employee generated content content real-time social computing broadcast technology connectivity Echo connect data protection consulting resources TV Guide Yammer out-of-home streaming social media marketing revenue second screen Netflix network business development HP case study SocialCast Nielsen conditional access business model B2B marketing social media plan communicate customer OTT leadership Fiesta social data multimeida corporate identity communication Social TV creative Adobe Connected Experience CIO interaction monetize customer service empower EGC Kontangent openness Time Warner Cable Altimeter DRM recommendations Dijit CMO adapt passion RSG Media policy business intelligence content delivery Collective Intellect BuddyTV Chyron IntoNow align New Technologies Kit Digital Forrester video marketing relationships governance cloud computing employees Gizmodo dog Verizon lead generation strategy content management discovery Buddy Media Gartner honesty organizations connected TV TNT social media index truth connected awareness TVPlus Buddy TV Web Strategy blog authenticity video listen trackur Mad Bear Productions broadcast, IBC, digital media, backchannel video conferencing Ford Fiesta firewall CSP Pinterest content marketing enterprise solutions online video platform Nigel Fenwick LinkedIn personality digital media marshall mcluhan cloud language Vizrt MAD perspectives value Peggy Dau company culture monitor authenticity, transparency, conversation, truth, honesty benefits FIFA World Cup ROI IP Viacom marketing control user generated content Kontiki SEC Intel engagement expectations planning streaming Skype planning, analysis Fan Media Engagement Center UGC Radian6 Microsoft Ford trust live streaming BT Conferencing ConnecTV network management GetGlue influence YouTube convergence brand collaborate microblogging, firewall, value, Yammer, Utterli, SocialText, SocialCast, technology sales ePrint Center Sysomos inspriation Quantum broadcast Evolve24 content security TBS market awareness connect, collaborate, communicate, digital media, consulting, social media social intelligence audience MassRelevance Visible Technologies net neutrality TV Miso media Mark Brodie cord cutting innovate North Plains convesation, interaction, social media, rich media, video, IBC advertising voice of customer big data executive support brand strategy microblogging rich media Forbidden Technologies conversation digital asset management Compuware data alignment endorsements Enterprise 2.0 social identity social media cable printing business plan Mad Bear Produionsct social media monitoring social HP Autonomy tablet webcasts viggle holidays Jeremiah Owyang New York Times message analytics workflow digital marketing MagicRuby Boston human social networking streaming media mobile apps Oracle program guide EMC NASCAR Citrix, trust web 2.0 Utterli stimulate Comcast snow tweetdeck NetBase cross channel NAB Facebook Harmonic customer support Aspera Virage MediaBin social media, firewall, social computing, employees, connect slideshare B2B NewsGator zeebox Tellybug Apple networking Createasphere HBO business goals productivity Video Box Score Aereo TV hootsuite Harris webinar